Methodology and Sample
Methodology
This study used a basic qualitative research design, using thematic analysis to explore and interpret the experiences of PK-12 school administrators. This approach allowed for a detailed examination of participants’ perspectives on how coaching influenced their leadership behaviors and organizational success (Creswell & Creswell, 2017; Creswell & Poth, 2018; Merriam & Tisdell, 2016). By focusing on their lived experiences, the study aimed to uncover the ways coaching can support professional growth and improve school outcomes.
The study used qualitative research methods to capture administrators’ lived experiences with coaching, offering a deep understanding of its impact on leadership behaviors and organizational success.
Participants and Sample Size
This research utilized qualitative methods, including a survey and semi-structured interviews, to capture the perceptions of school administrators within the Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) education system regarding their experiences being coached. Participants were selected through purposeful sampling to ensure their experiences would directly relate to the research objectives.
Eligibility Criteria for Participants
- Currently serving as a school administrator within the Seventh-day Adventist education system
- Holding a role as a principal, teaching principal, or vice-principal
- At least two years of experience as a school administrator
- Completion of at least 1.5 years of coaching within the targeted coaching program
This study focused on school administrators in the SDA education system who met specific experience and coaching involvement criteria to ensure the relevance of their insights.
Sample Size
While the study originally sought 10 participants, the sample size was limited to seven due to difficulties in recruitment. However, data saturation was reached, as no new information or themes emerged after the seventh interview. This confirmed that the data collected was sufficient to address the research questions and draw meaningful conclusions (Hennink et al., 2017; Hennink & Kaiser, 2022; Sim et al., 2018; Staller, 2021).
Despite a smaller sample size, the study achieved data saturation, meaning no new themes emerged after the seventh interview. This confirmed the adequacy of the sample in answering the research questions.
Amy's Assessment 