Limitations

While the findings of this study provide valuable insights, there are several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results.

Small Sample Size

---

The sample of participants was a small representation of the total number of coachees in the program. A larger sample size might have yielded broader and more diverse perspectives on the coaching experience, potentially influencing the generalizability of the results.

Diverse Cohorts

---

The study originally intended to focus on participants from a single cohort, but due to recruitment challenges, participants were drawn from three different cohorts. Differences in the content and structure of the coaching program across these cohorts—such as the fact that one cohort met exclusively virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic, while others had in-person sessions—may have impacted participants’ experiences and perceptions.

Variety of Roles

---

Participants in the study held different roles, with five being principals and two serving as vice principals. While both groups noted the benefits of coaching, the vice principals specifically mentioned perceived limitations in their ability to influence organizational change compared to their principal counterparts.

Limited Perspectives

---

The study focused solely on the perceptions of the participants who received coaching. While this offers valuable insights into their personal growth and leadership development, it does not account for the perspectives of their coaches or colleagues who might have offered different viewpoints.

Ethical Considerations

---

The study was conducted with careful attention to ethical considerations. As a practicing member of the Seventh-day Adventist faith and a former educator within the same community, I remained conscious of potential biases. Additionally, I maintained a strict distinction between my role as a researcher and my professional duties, as the organization funding the coaching program was also my employer.